Service / Advise
Expert judgement for the questions a test cannot answer.
Advisory covers architecture, application security practice and priorities, so the decisions that shape your exposure are made with the trade-offs in plain view.
- Purpose
- Inform design and priority decisions
- Deliverables
- Architecture review report, Threat model, Prioritized roadmap, Working sessions
- Starts with
- An agreed question, inputs and deliverable
Overview
What security advisory and architecture review is for.
Advisory work is most valuable before and after testing. Before, it helps design systems that are easier to secure. After, it turns a set of findings into a plan that fixes causes rather than symptoms.
Engagements are focused and specific. Each one has an agreed question, a defined set of inputs and a deliverable that someone in your organization can act on.
Suited to
- Designing a new platform, product or major integration
- Turning assessment and test findings into a realistic roadmap
- Establishing or improving secure development practice
- Bringing attack surface ownership and governance under control
Typically in scope
- Security architecture and design review
- Threat modeling for systems and features
- Application security and secure development practice
- Attack surface governance and ownership
- Prioritization of findings into a security roadmap
Approach
How the work is done.
The steps every engagement follows, at the level we share publicly.
- 01
Frame the question
Agree what decision the work should inform, who will use the result and which inputs are available. - 02
Review and model
Examine designs, documents and existing findings, and work through likely threats with your team. - 03
Analyze trade-offs
Weigh risk, cost and effort so recommendations are realistic for your organization. - 04
Recommend and plan
Deliver clear, prioritized recommendations and a plan that fits your capacity.
Deliverables
What you receive.
Deliverables are confirmed in writing during scoping, so you know exactly what to expect before the work begins.
- 01Architecture review report
- Risks, trade-offs and recommended changes for the design under review.
- 02Threat model
- The threats that matter for the system, the controls that address them and the remaining gaps.
- 03Prioritized roadmap
- Improvements ordered by risk reduction and feasibility.
- 04Working sessions
- Time with your architects and engineers to test recommendations against reality.
Before we start
What we need, and what is not included.
What we need from you
- A clearly stated question or decision the work should inform
- Access to relevant designs, documentation and people
- Existing assessment or test results, where available
Not included
- Certification, compliance attestation or audit opinions.
- Hands-on testing, which is scoped as a separate service.
- Ongoing managed security operations, which run on Threatless SOC, the live defensive platform.
Related technology
Where software helps.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management
Threatless CTEM
Designed to turn advisory priorities into a continuous, tracked process.
Explore CTEM
Questions
What teams ask before scoping.
Do you implement the recommendations?
The focus is analysis and guidance your teams can implement. Follow-up reviews and testing can confirm that changes work as intended.
Can advisory work replace a penetration test?
No. Advisory work improves decisions and design. Testing provides evidence of how systems behave. They work best together.
How is an engagement scoped?
Around a specific question, agreed inputs and a defined deliverable, so the time is spent on what changes a decision.
Related
Security Advisory & Architecture Review
Bring us the decision in front of you.
Describe the decision, the inputs available and any deadline. We will propose a scope.